Development of an Online Cemetery Management Web Application with Integrated Mapping System Using Dijkstra’s Algorithm for Path Selection
Downloads
This study presents the design, development, and evaluation of an Online Cemetery Management System (OCMS) with an integrated mapping module that uses Dijkstra’s Algorithm for path selection, implemented at Holy Gardens Memorial Park in Taytay, Rizal, Philippines. Traditional cemetery operations continue to rely on paper-based records, informal reservation channels, and static physical maps, resulting in inefficiencies, data inconsistencies, and navigational difficulties, particularly during peak visitation periods such as Undas. To address these challenges, the system integrates Geographic Information Systems (GIS) via Leaflet.js with PostGIS-enabled spatial databases, real-time GPS navigation, augmented-reality wayfinding, and an online burial-plot reservation module within a unified web-based platform. The system was developed using an Agile methodology with a Node.js and Express.js backend, PostgreSQL with PostGIS for spatial data management, and EJS for server-side rendering. Evaluation followed ISO/IEC 25010 quality standards across seven domains: Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, Compatibility, Usability, Reliability, Security, and Portability. Quality assurance testing employed Cypress, Postman, Google Lighthouse, OWASP ZAP, and BrowserStack, yielding scores between 8/10 and 9/10. User evaluation data collected from 63 respondents produced mean scores ranging from 3.66 to 3.90 on a 4-point Likert scale, with all domains rated as Excellent. The findings demonstrate that integrating GIS, algorithmic pathfinding, and web-based administrative tools within a single platform effectively addresses the operational gaps identified in both the literature and existing cemetery management applications. The study contributes to the growing body of research on digital cemetery management by providing an empirically validated, open-source implementation model applicable to resource-constrained cemetery administrations in Southeast Asia and comparable contexts.
Abdullah, S., Hussain, N. H. M., Talib, N., Hashim, I. C., Hashim, H., & Osoman, M. A. (2022). Development of Muslim Graveyard Management System (MGMS) using Geospatial Technology applications. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i4/15035
Agostini, A. L. C., Manfroi, C., Pereira, R., Da Costa, E. M., & Santos, N. D. (2024). Cemetery: More Human, Intelligent, and Sustainable. 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE), 132–138.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ie61493.2024.10599898
Allison, F., Nansen, B., Gibbs, M., Arnold, M., Holleran, S., & Kohn, T. (2023). Reimagining memorial spaces through digital technologies: A typology of CemTech. Death Studies, 48(8), 790–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2023.2276308
Amoah, E. G., Forkuor, D., & Opoku, F. (2024). The last cityscapes: Public cemetery management in Kumasi’s urban terrain. Mortality, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2024.2390468
Aspöck, E., Eichert, S., Theodoridou, M., Felicetti, A., & Richards, N. (2023). Integrating data on early medieval graves: Mapping the THANADOS database to the ARIADNE infrastructure with the Mortuary Data Application Profile. Internet Archaeology, 64. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.64.11
Bai, N., Ducci, M., Mirzikashvili, R., Nourian, P., & Roders, A. P. (2023). Mapping urban heritage images with social media data and artificial intelligence. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-M-2–2023, 139–146.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-2-2023-139-2023
Balla, D., & Gede, M. (2025). Vector data rendering performance analysis of open-source web mapping libraries. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(9), 336.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14090336
Chibuye, B., & Phiri, J. (2022). An assessment for record keeping and cemetery management: A case of Lusaka City Council, Zambia based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Open Journal of Business and Management, 10(2), 577–590.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2022.102032
Colleter, R., & Barreau, J. (2021). 3D reconstruction and geostatic analysis of an early medieval cemetery. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1688.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091688
Crisanto-Perrazo, T., Guayasamín-Vergara, J., Mayorga-Llerena, E., Sinde-Gonzalez, I., Vizuete-Freire, D., Toulkeridis, T., Gomez, G. F., & Fierro-Naranjo, G. (2022). Determination of empirical environmental indices for the location of cemeteriesAn innovative proposal for worldwide use. Sustainability, 14(10), 6284. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106284
Da Silva, F. C., De Assis Cavallaro, F., Aquino, W. F., & Tonello, P. S. (2022). Use of geophysical techniques for analysis of trace metals in a cemetery unsaturated soil zone. Geociências, 41(2), 517–525.
https://doi.org/10.5016/geociencias.v41i02.16227
Długoński, A., Dushkova, D., & Haase, D. (2022). Urban cemeteriesPlaces of multiple diversity and challenges. Land, 11(5), 677.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050677
Długozima, A. (2022). How to find a suitable location for a cemetery? Application of multi-criteria evaluation for identifying potential sites. Moravian Geographical Reports, 30(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2022-0003
Engel, D., & Rubinstein, J. (2023). Drones, phones, and stones: Visualization for collaborative digitization of historic cemeteries. Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing, 413–416.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3569951.3603633
Gonçalves, V., Albuquerque, A., Carvalho, P., Almeida, P., & Cavaleiro, V. (2023). Groundwater vulnerability assessment to cemeteries pollution through GIS-based DRASTIC index. Water, 15(4), 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040812
Grabalov, P., & Nordh, H. (2021). The future of urban cemeteries as public spaces: Insights from Oslo and Copenhagen. Planning Theory & Practice, 23(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1993973
Häkkilä, J., et al. (2024). Virtual reality and augmented reality applications for cemetery heritage sites. [Conference proceedings].
Horbiński, T., Cybulski, P., & Medyńska-Gulij, B. (2021). Web map effectiveness in the responsive context of the graphical user interface. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(3), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10030134
Horbiński, T., & Smaczyński, M. (2023). Interactive thematic map as a means of documenting and visualizing information about cultural heritage objects. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(7), 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12070257
Katapally, T. R., Elsahli, N., & Bhawra, J. (2024). DiScO: Novel rapid systems mapping to inform digital transformation of health systems. Frontiers in Public Health, 12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1441328
Klingemann, H. (2022). Cemeteries in transformationA Swiss community conflict study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 76, 127729.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127729
Klingemann, H., Schmid, J., Umbricht, A., Rota, D., & Hametner, N. (2024). Journey to the grave. Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding, 8(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2024.v8.i1.a147
Larentis, O., et al. (2024). An interdisciplinary analysis of the late Islamic cemeteries within the Cathedral and the ruins of Adulis, Massawa, Eritrea. Heritage, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8010001
Lo Duca, A., Abrate, M., Marchetti, A., & Moretti, M.
(2024). Genealogical data-driven visits of historical cemeteries. Informatics, 11(1), 9.
https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11010009
Loffreda, G., Chikovani, I., Mocumbi, A. O., Asmar, M. K., Blanco, L. C., Grant, L., & Ager, A. (2023). Informing adaptation strategy through mapping the dynamics linking climate change, health, and other human systems. PLOS Climate, 2(4), e0000184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000184
Maddrell, A., McNally, D., Beebeejaun, Y., McClymont, K., & Mathijssen, B. (2021). Intersections of (infra)structural violence and cultural inclusion: The geopolitics of minority cemeteries and crematoria provision. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 46(3), 675–688.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12437
Mathijssen, B. (2025). Mapping nature burial in the Netherlands (2003–2023). Mortality, 1–32.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2025.2449904
May, M. J., Kantor, E., & Zror, N. (2021). CemoMemo. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 14(4), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3467888
McClymont, K., & Sinnett, D. (2021). Planning cemeteries: Their potential contribution to green infrastructure and ecosystem services. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.789925
Milewska, A., Kacprzak, M., Wielewska, I., Dabrowski, P., & Chrzaszcz, A. (2024). The specificity and costs of public services in cemetery maintenance: A case study of Bydgoszcz City. European Research Studies Journal, XXVII(2), 101–117.
https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3373
Noor, N. B. M., Sabir, N. S. K., Ibrahim, I. B., & Azhari, A. W. B. (2023). Geospatial technologies approach for cemetery management solutions: A review. Jurnal Planologi, 20(2), 105.
https://doi.org/10.30659/jpsa.v20i2.30226
Nordh, H., Olafsson, A. S., Kajosaari, A., Præstholm, S., Liu, Y., Rossi, S., & Gentin, S. (2022). Similar spaces, different usage: A comparative study on how residents in the capitals of Finland and Denmark use cemeteries as recreational landscapes. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 73, 127598.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127598
Ocón, D., & Young, W. P. (2024). Bridging the nature–cultural heritage gap: Evaluating sustainable entanglements through cemeteries in urban Asia. Sustainability Science, 19(5), 1641–1660.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01533-2
Oyeleke, O. O., & Oloukoi, G. (2024). Sustainability practices in urban cemetery management. Path of Science, 10(4), 4001–4007.
https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.103-5
Pál, M., & Hajdú, E. (2023). Setting standards for cemetery spatial databasesA case study. Abstracts of the ICA, 6, 1–2.
https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-6-195-2023
Pál, M., & Hajdú, E. (2024). Methodological innovations for establishing cemetery spatial databasesA UAV-based workflow helping small communities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13(2), 57.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13020057
Sabir, N. S. K., & Noor, N. M. (2024). Object-oriented classification approach (OBIA) in extracting burial plot for Muslim cemeteries management. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1412(1), 012017.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1412/1/012017
Sallay, Á., Tar, I. G., Mikházi, Z., Takács, K., Furlan, C., & Krippner, U. (2023). The role of urban cemeteries in ecosystem services and habitat protection. Plants, 12(6), 1269.
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061269
Saraf, M. H. M., Ridzuan, N. I., & Mustaffa, M. F. (2024). The use of geospatial information system for an enhanced property valuation process. Journal of Computing Research and Innovation, 9(2).
https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v9i2.457
Sarigai, S., Yang, L., Slack, K., Lane, K. M. D., Buenemann, M., Wu, Q., Woodhull, G., & Driscol, J. (2024). idwMapper: An interactive and data-driven web mapping framework for visualizing and sensing high-dimensional geospatial (big) data. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.11001
Säumel, I., Butenschön, S., & Kreibig, N. (2023).
Gardens of life: Multifunctional and ecosystem services of urban cemeteries in Central Europe and beyond. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1077565
Seramur, K. C., Campbell, K. B., Anderson, J. B., & Cowan, E. A. (2023). On Cemetery Hill: The legacy of burials at Clemson University. Archaeological Prospection. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1916
Spera, S. A., Franklin, M. S., Zizzamia, E. A., & Smith, R. K. (2022). Recovering a Black cemetery: Automated mapping of hidden gravesites using an SUAV and GIS. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 26(4), 1110–1131.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-021-00642-3
Sultana, M., Khandaker, N., Anannya, T. T., & Islam, M. N. (2021). Requirements elicitation and development of a graveyard management system in the context of Bangladesh. 2021 International Conference on Science & Contemporary Technologies (ICSCT), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsct53883.2021.9642654
Teo, C., Wang, X., Tan, S. C., & Lee, J. W. Y. (2023). Enhancing critical thinking in operations management education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2023.2216388
Vargas, T. M., Uribe, C. L., Bedoya, S. V., Zapata, M. L. Q., & Cardona-Gallo, S. A. (2022). Cemetery relocations in Hidroituango: An interdisciplinary study. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciências, 94(1).
https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202220201098
Wall, J., Bohnenstiehl, D. R., Levine, N. S., Millhauser, J. K., McGill, D. E., Wegmann, K. W., & Melomo, V. (2023). A geospatial and archaeological investigation of an African–American cemetery in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. Archaeological Prospection. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1921
