Negative Effects of Selfish Nodes in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (Manets): A Comprehensive Review and Analytical Framework
Downloads
Mobile ad hoc networks depend upon the multi-hop collaboration of the nodes; that is, the nodes not just act as end systems but also behave as routers to forward the packets of other users. However, in the real world, the nodes might act selfishly to conserve scarce resources such as battery power, bandwidth, CPU time, and buffer space. Unlike other attacks that are intended to destroy the network, selfish behavior might be economically rational, intermittent, and context dependent. Hence, selfish behavior might not always be easy to detect and, more importantly, might cause performance degradation that manifests because of mobility and wireless effects. This paper integrates the impact of selfish nodes on MANETs and shows how local non-cooperative behavior can cause network-wide decline. We present a taxonomy of selfish behavior at different layers of the network such as routing misbehavior, selective forwarding, fake route report generation, resource hoarding, and MAC layer misbehavior. We then show how local selfish behavior can cause network-wide decline about packet delivery ratio, delay, jitter, routing overhead, energy dissipation, fairness, and network partitioning. To facilitate easy understanding of the effects of selfish behavior, we present simple analytical models that relate the level of selfishness and path lengths to the probability of end-to-end packet delivery. We then present a reproducibility template for the evaluation of selfish behavior about the choice of protocols used, the selfish behavior modeling used, the metrics used for evaluation, and statistical reporting of the results. The integration of the effects of selfish behavior highlights that a significant effect of selfish behavior might be the formation of a feedback loop that causes packet loss due to rerouting, which in turn causes more routing overhead that consumes scarce resources such as energy and bandwidth, which might cause other nodes to behave selfishly as well. Hence, the cost of selfish behavior might not just be packeting loss but the possible shortening of the network lifetime and the compromising of mission- critical applications due to the selfish behavior of a small number of nodes.
Marti et al.'s research paper on mitigating routing misbehavior in MANETs, published at MobiCom 2000 (pages 255-265).
Buttyan and Hubaux's research paper on incentivizing cooperation in self-organizing MANETs, published in Mobile Networks and Applications (volume 8, pages 579-592, 2003).
Zhong et al.'s research paper on Sprite: a simple, cheat-proof credit-based system for mobile ad hoc networks, published at IEEE INFOCOM 2003.
Shan et al.'s research paper on quantitative analysis of energy-cost-driven selfishness in MANETs, published in Sensors (volume 21, issue 3, article 716, 2021; doi:10.3390/s21030716).
Vanday Baseri and Fatemidokht's research paper on survey of different methods for detection of selfish nodes in MANETs, published in Journal of Mahani Mathematical Research (volume 11, issue 2, pages 45-59, 2022; doi:10.22103/jmmrc.2022.18626.1180).
Kyasanur and Vaidya's research paper on modeling and preventing selfish MAC layer misbehavior in wireless networks, published in IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (volume 4, issue 5, pages 502-516, 2005).
Jim et al.'s research paper on enhanced security for MANETs using an AIS-based danger theory for detection of selfish nodes, published in Computers & Security (volume 113, article 102538, 2022; doi:10.1016/j.cose.2021.102538).
Nirmala Bai et al.'s research paper on design of intrusion detection system using discretion of leading agent and machine learning for efficient MANET system, published in Scientific Reports (2025; doi:10.1038/s41598-025-89221-8).
Here is the text rewritten in a freer, more conversational style, while retaining the same topic and details:
Balakrishnan, Deng, and Varshney propose TWOACK as a means to limit selfish behavior in mobile ad hoc networks, published in the proceedings for the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference in 2005.
Michiardi and Molva propose a collaborative reputation system called CORE, meant to enforce cooperation among nodes in mobile ad hoc networks, published in Communications and Multimedia Security (Springer) in 2002, pages 107–121, doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-35612-9_9.
Buchegger and Le Boudec evaluate the performance of the CONFIDANT protocol, published in the proceedings for ACM MobiHoc in 2002, doi: 10.1145/513800.513828.
Nirmaladevi and Prabha propose a selfish node trust aware approach with optimized clustering for reliable routing in mobile ad hoc networks, published in Measurement: Sensors, vol. 28, article 100680, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2023.100680.
Marti, S., Giuli, T. J., Lai, K., & Baker, M. (2000). Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom ’00) (pp. 255–265).
Michiardi, P., & Molva, R. (2002). CORE: A collaborative reputation mechanism to enforce node cooperation in mobile ad hoc networks. In Communications and Multimedia Security (pp. 107–121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35612-9_9
Nirmala Bai, K. S., Subramanyam, M. V., & others. (2025). Integrated intrusion detection design with discretion of leading agent using machine learning for efficient MANET system. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89221-8
Nirmaladevi, K., & Prabha, K. (2023). A selfish node trust aware with optimized clustering for reliable routing protocol in MANET. Measurement: Sensors, 28, 100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100680
Perkins, C. E., & Royer, E. M. (1999). Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA) (pp. 90–100).
Shan, A., Fan, X., Wu, C., Zhang, X., & Fan, S. (2021). Quantitative study on the impact of energy consumption based dynamic selfishness in MANETs. Sensors, 21(3), 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030716
Vanday Baseri, M., & Fatemidokht, H. (2022). Survey of different techniques for detecting selfish nodes in MANETs. Journal of Mahani Mathematical Research, 11(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.22103/jmmrc.2022.18626.1180
Varga, A., & Hornig, R. (2008). An overview of the OMNeT++ simulation environment. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques (SIMUTools).
Wu, C., Gerla, M., & van der Schaar, M. (2017). Social norm incentives for network coding in MANETs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(3), 1761–1774.
Zhong, S., Chen, J., & Yang, Y. R. (2003). Sprite: A simple, cheat-proof, credit-based system for mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2003.
Lupia, A., & Di Rango, F. (2016). A probabilistic energy-efficient approach for monitoring and detecting malicious/selfish nodes in mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).
Rehman, G. U., Ghani, A., Zubair, M., Naqvi, S. H. A., Singh, D., & Muhammad, S. (2019).IPS: Incentive and punishment scheme for omitting selfishness in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). IEEE Access, 7, 109026–109037.
