Development of Augmented Reality-Based Stem Learning Strategies to Improve Global Competence of Middle School Students in North Sumatra Province
Downloads
The need to develop learning strategies based on information and communication technology (ICT) is aimed at improving students' global competencies in schools. One way to address monotonous learning and improve student learning outcomes is through the development of learning strategies based on relevant learning media in the current era, namely Augmented Reality (AR)-based Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) learning strategies. An opinion survey was conducted through questionnaires and interviews with 30 teachers who were selected proportionally and actively working in secondary schools in the North Sumatra Province. The results of data processing from the needs analysis showed that the needs felt by teachers in managing learning were as follows: there were 26 teachers (86.33%) who felt the need for determining learning outcomes in the realm of high-level thinking skills; 27 teachers (90.33%) felt it was very important to implement STEM learning strategies; 26 teachers (86.67%) stated that it was very important to present factual learning materials based on integrated ICT based on Augmented Reality in the teaching and learning process; 22 teachers (86.66%) also stated that learning strategies with an active student learning approach through problem-based learning were very important to support the implementation of an effective, efficient and attractive learning system. 28 teachers (93.33%) stated that developing learning materials required building students' reasoning both inductively and deductively based on science and technology as well as research results to improve students' global competence; Communication in the form of social media networks was felt by 25 teachers (83.33%) to be very important to support collaboration and cooperation between students.
Alismaiel, O. A., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2022). The impact of integrating technology on student engagement and learning outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-25.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.
Brian, K. (2012). Augmented Reality: A New Reality. CRC Press.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Daodu, O. O., Banihashemi, S., & Khezri, H. (2024). Constructivist learning approach in enhancing student participation and critical thinking skills: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Research, 117(2), 249-264.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Publications.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (2005). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Pearson.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction. Allyn & Bacon.
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.
Garner, P. W. (2017). The effect of STEM education on academic and non-academic outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of STEM Education, 18(1), 42-53.
Hannover, B. (2017). STEM education: A review of the literature. Journal of STEM Education, 18(1), 10-23.
https://acacia.edu/blog/how-stem-education-prepares-the-next-generation-innovators- problem-solvers/
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
Illkou, A., & others. (2021). Personalized learning in the digital age: A systematic review.International Journal of Educational Research, 106, 102164.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Jorge, C. M. H., & others. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(2), 4-12.
Marc, P. (2001). The Future of Learning: From eLearning to mLearning. Bertelsmann Foundation.
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., & Contero, M. (2011). Improving academic performance and motivation in engineering students using augmented reality. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(3), 1-11.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370- 396.
Masri, M., & others. (2023). The impact of augmented reality on students' understanding of science concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(2), 1-15.
OECD. (2024). Innovative Learning Environments: Lessons from the OECD's Future of Education and Skills 2030 Project. OECD Publishing.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Pratama, A. (2023). The effectiveness of augmented reality in mathematics education: A systematic review. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 54(4), 1-20.
Saavedra, A. R., & others. (2023). The role of education in fostering global competence: A review of the literature. Journal of Global Competence, 1(1), 1-15.
Sari, L. N., & others. (2023). The potential of augmented reality in enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 15(1), 1-18.
Schmalzle, R., & others. (2024). Bridging the gap between research and practice in education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100424.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson.
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education.EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30-32.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Torlakson, T. (2014). Greatness by Design: Rebuilding California's Schools. California Department of Education.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Welty, W. M. (2007). The ADDIE Model: A Framework for Instructional Design. Pfeiffer Yazigy, R. (2023). The impact of educational values on student outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 97, 102655.
Zhongling Pi, Jingjing Dong, Jiayu Wang, Xiying Li and Xin Zhao Citation:International Journal of STEM Education 2025 12:18 Content type:ResearchPublished on: 13 March 2025
